Defense rankings — 2026 Week 3
Use this for the order, not the number. Ranking defenses this way is about twice as good as ranking them by season-to-date fantasy points (Spearman 0.29 out of sample vs 0.13) — but half of what a defense scores is turnovers and touchdowns, which nothing predicts.
| Defense | Proj | Floor–ceiling | Pts allowed | from tiers | Sacks | Turnovers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SEA @ WAS | 9.1 | 2.9 – 16.3 | 16.1 | +2.2 | 3.0 | 1.5 |
| 2 | KC @ MIA | 8.6 | 2.3 – 15.7 | 17.8 | +1.8 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| 3 | NYG vs TEN | 7.9 | 1.6 – 15.0 | 18.0 | +1.7 | 2.8 | 1.3 |
| 4 | CIN @ PIT | 7.5 | 1.2 – 14.7 | 19.7 | +1.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| 5 | PHI @ CHI | 7.5 | 1.2 – 14.7 | 19.7 | +1.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| 6 | CAR @ CLE | 7.5 | 1.2 – 14.6 | 19.8 | +1.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| 7 | GB vs ATL | 7.3 | 1.1 – 14.5 | 19.8 | +1.2 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 8 | HOU @ IND | 7.2 | 0.9 – 14.4 | 20.3 | +1.0 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 9 | SF vs ARI | 7.2 | 0.9 – 14.3 | 20.7 | +0.9 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 10 | NO vs LV | 7.1 | 0.8 – 14.2 | 20.3 | +1.0 | 2.6 | 1.3 |
| 11 | MIN @ TB | 7.1 | 0.8 – 14.2 | 20.8 | +0.9 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 12 | TEN @ NYG | 7.0 | 0.7 – 14.1 | 20.4 | +1.0 | 2.6 | 1.3 |
| 13 | DET vs NYJ | 6.9 | 0.6 – 14.1 | 21.4 | +0.8 | 2.5 | 1.4 |
| 14 | BUF vs LAC | 6.8 | 0.5 – 13.9 | 21.9 | +0.6 | 2.5 | 1.4 |
| 15 | DEN vs LA | 6.6 | 0.3 – 13.8 | 21.4 | +0.8 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| 16 | JAX vs NE | 6.5 | 0.2 – 13.6 | 22.0 | +0.6 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| 17 | IND vs HOU | 6.3 | -0.0 – 13.4 | 22.0 | +0.6 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 18 | LA @ DEN | 6.2 | -0.1 – 13.3 | 22.8 | +0.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 |
| 19 | TB vs MIN | 6.1 | -0.2 – 13.2 | 22.5 | +0.5 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 20 | CLE vs CAR | 6.0 | -0.2 – 13.2 | 22.5 | +0.5 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 21 | LV @ NO | 5.8 | -0.5 – 12.9 | 23.9 | +0.1 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 22 | PIT vs CIN | 5.7 | -0.6 – 12.8 | 23.5 | +0.2 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 23 | BAL @ DAL | 5.7 | -0.6 – 12.8 | 25.3 | -0.2 | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| 24 | CHI vs PHI | 5.7 | -0.6 – 12.8 | 23.5 | +0.2 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 25 | ATL @ GB | 5.5 | -0.7 – 12.7 | 24.4 | +0.0 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 26 | NE @ JAX | 5.4 | -0.9 – 12.6 | 25.0 | -0.1 | 2.2 | 1.3 |
| 27 | WAS vs SEA | 4.9 | -1.4 – 12.0 | 25.2 | -0.2 | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| 28 | ARI @ SF | 4.1 | -2.1 – 11.3 | 28.4 | -0.9 | 1.9 | 1.1 |
| 29 | DAL vs BAL | 4.1 | -2.2 – 11.2 | 28.6 | -0.9 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| 30 | NYJ @ DET | 4.1 | -2.2 – 11.2 | 28.6 | -1.0 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| 31 | LAC @ BUF | 4.0 | -2.3 – 11.1 | 29.1 | -1.1 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| 32 | MIA vs KC | 3.8 | -2.5 – 10.9 | 28.4 | -0.9 | 1.9 | 1.0 |
Projected points allowed comes from the posted total and the opponent's implied
total; the tier column is the expectation across the points-allowed tiers, not the
tier a single projection happens to land in. Defensive touchdowns and safeties are
the league mean — nothing forecasts them
(fitted 2019-2025).
Measured walk-forward, one season held out at a time: Spearman
0.295, MAE 4.27 against a
4.41 league-mean baseline, R² 0.079
over 3,136 defense-games. The R² is the honest ceiling: this
orders defenses, it does not predict their scores. Study at
backtests/kicker_dst/FINDINGS.md.