Defense rankings — 2026 Week 4
Use this for the order, not the number. Ranking defenses this way is about twice as good as ranking them by season-to-date fantasy points (Spearman 0.29 out of sample vs 0.13) — but half of what a defense scores is turnovers and touchdowns, which nothing predicts.
| Defense | Proj | Floor–ceiling | Pts allowed | from tiers | Sacks | Turnovers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIN vs MIA | 9.6 | 3.4 – 16.8 | 14.5 | +2.8 | 3.1 | 1.5 |
| 2 | BAL vs TEN | 9.2 | 3.0 – 16.4 | 15.7 | +2.4 | 3.0 | 1.5 |
| 3 | GB @ TB | 8.1 | 1.8 – 15.2 | 18.1 | +1.7 | 2.8 | 1.4 |
| 4 | SEA vs LAC | 8.1 | 1.8 – 15.2 | 18.0 | +1.7 | 2.8 | 1.4 |
| 5 | PIT @ CLE | 8.0 | 1.7 – 15.1 | 18.3 | +1.6 | 2.8 | 1.4 |
| 6 | LA @ PHI | 7.5 | 1.2 – 14.7 | 19.7 | +1.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| 7 | IND @ WAS | 7.1 | 0.8 – 14.2 | 21.1 | +0.8 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 8 | CHI vs NYJ | 7.1 | 0.8 – 14.2 | 20.3 | +1.0 | 2.6 | 1.3 |
| 9 | ARI @ NYG | 7.0 | 0.7 – 14.1 | 21.2 | +0.8 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 10 | KC @ LV | 6.9 | 0.7 – 14.1 | 21.6 | +0.7 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 11 | BUF vs NE | 6.9 | 0.6 – 14.1 | 21.4 | +0.8 | 2.5 | 1.4 |
| 12 | CLE vs PIT | 6.5 | 0.2 – 13.7 | 21.1 | +0.8 | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| 13 | TB vs GB | 6.4 | 0.1 – 13.6 | 21.3 | +0.8 | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| 14 | HOU vs DAL | 6.2 | -0.1 – 13.3 | 23.0 | +0.3 | 2.4 | 1.3 |
| 15 | SF vs DEN | 6.2 | -0.1 – 13.3 | 23.0 | +0.3 | 2.4 | 1.3 |
| 16 | DET @ CAR | 6.1 | -0.1 – 13.3 | 24.0 | +0.1 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 17 | NO vs ATL | 6.0 | -0.3 – 13.1 | 23.3 | +0.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| 18 | NYJ @ CHI | 5.8 | -0.5 – 12.9 | 23.9 | +0.1 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 19 | PHI vs LA | 5.7 | -0.6 – 12.8 | 23.5 | +0.2 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 20 | CIN vs JAX | 5.6 | -0.7 – 12.7 | 24.7 | -0.1 | 2.2 | 1.3 |
| 21 | ATL @ NO | 5.6 | -0.7 – 12.7 | 24.7 | -0.1 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| 22 | NYG vs ARI | 5.6 | -0.7 – 12.7 | 24.0 | +0.1 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 23 | LAC @ SEA | 5.1 | -1.1 – 12.3 | 25.2 | -0.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| 24 | DAL @ HOU | 5.1 | -1.2 – 12.2 | 26.0 | -0.4 | 2.2 | 1.3 |
| 25 | DEN @ SF | 5.1 | -1.2 – 12.2 | 26.0 | -0.4 | 2.2 | 1.3 |
| 26 | MIA @ MIN | 5.1 | -1.2 – 12.2 | 24.8 | -0.1 | 2.2 | 1.1 |
| 27 | WAS vs IND | 4.8 | -1.5 – 12.0 | 26.0 | -0.4 | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| 28 | JAX @ CIN | 4.8 | -1.5 – 11.9 | 27.2 | -0.7 | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| 29 | LV vs KC | 4.7 | -1.6 – 11.8 | 26.4 | -0.5 | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| 30 | TEN @ BAL | 4.2 | -2.1 – 11.3 | 27.6 | -0.7 | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| 31 | NE @ BUF | 4.1 | -2.2 – 11.2 | 28.6 | -1.0 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| 32 | CAR vs DET | 3.9 | -2.4 – 11.1 | 28.9 | -1.0 | 1.9 | 1.1 |
Projected points allowed comes from the posted total and the opponent's implied
total; the tier column is the expectation across the points-allowed tiers, not the
tier a single projection happens to land in. Defensive touchdowns and safeties are
the league mean — nothing forecasts them
(fitted 2019-2025).
Measured walk-forward, one season held out at a time: Spearman
0.295, MAE 4.27 against a
4.41 league-mean baseline, R² 0.079
over 3,136 defense-games. The R² is the honest ceiling: this
orders defenses, it does not predict their scores. Study at
backtests/kicker_dst/FINDINGS.md.