Draft Board

Expert consensus (FantasyPros ECR) with stock movement and analyst disagreement. Built from 39 snapshots; movement compares the last 4.

Consensus board may be stale. Last updated 2026-09-25 00:00 (2 days ago), past the 48h expected refresh. Capture runs daily at 12:00 UTC.
Redraft Dynasty Best ball All QB RB WR TE
#PlayerPosTeam ECR Move Range Excess
1 Jahmyr Gibbs RB DET 4.2 +0.1 3–6 -5.7
2 Bijan Robinson RB ATL 4.2 -0.4 3–5 -6.1
3 Ashton Jeanty RB LV 9.4 +0.7 8–11 -6.0
4 De'Von Achane RB MIA 14.2 +1.4 9–18 -4.8
5 Jeremiyah Love RB ARI 14.8 -2.9 7–35 +2.4
6 James Cook III RB BUF 15.2 +0.0 8–20 -3.8
7 Omarion Hampton RB LAC 17.6 +1.0 13–22 -5.0
8 Jonathan Taylor RB IND 22.4 -3.9 12–40 +1.4
9 Kenneth Walker III RB KC 22.8 +5.8 16–29 -4.3
10 Breece Hall RB NYJ 32.8 +3.1 21–54 +2.2
11 Chase Brown RB CIN 39.4 +2.0 37–43 -8.1
12 Christian McCaffrey RB SF 52.2 -0.8 23–65 +4.0
13 Saquon Barkley RB PHI 53.4 +1.2 37–64 -2.4
14 Quinshon Judkins RB CLE 55.8 -0.3 41–80 +3.0
15 Kyren Williams RB LAR 58.2 -1.5 50–67 -5.6
16 TreVeyon Henderson RB NE 58.2 -2.1 52–67 -5.8
17 Jadarian Price RB SEA 62.4 +10.3 49–72 -3.4
18 Javonte Williams RB DAL 68.0 +0.9 52–86 -1.9
19 Bucky Irving RB TB 73.8 -9.9 62–90 -3.4
20 Travis Etienne Jr. RB NO 74.0 -4.4 66–88 -5.5
21 Derrick Henry RB BAL 80.0 -1.2 64–89 -5.1
22 Cam Skattebo RB NYG 81.4 -10.3 67–90 -5.6
23 Bhayshul Tuten RB JAC 83.8 -1.7 66–97 -4.2
24 D'Andre Swift RB CHI 87.2 +1.2 77–101 -6.3
25 Josh Jacobs RB GB 94.2 -15.4 71–129 +4.1
26 David Montgomery RB HOU 101.0 +3.3 90–108 -9.9
27 Jaylen Warren RB PIT 108.8 -2.4 88–131 +1.5
28 Kyle Monangai RB CHI 113.8 +1.8 95–136 +0.3
29 RJ Harvey RB DEN 123.0 -3.1 100–149 +0.5
30 Chuba Hubbard RB CAR 127.6 +6.8 101–181 +10.3 CONTENTIOUS
31 Jonah Coleman RB DEN 129.0 +6.4 100–190 +12.9 CONTENTIOUS
32 Blake Corum RB LAR 130.0 -12.7 107–149 -4.9
33 Rico Dowdle RB PIT 135.2 -0.6 129–140 -14.8
34 Rhamondre Stevenson RB NE 135.4 -3.3 120–146 -9.5
35 Jonathon Brooks RB CAR 143.2 -11.9 87–170 +11.3 CONTENTIOUS
36 Tony Pollard RB TEN 146.6 +0.5 113–181 +2.8
37 Kenny Gainwell RB TB 149.2 -1.1 123–168 -5.1
38 Zach Charbonnet RB SEA 154.4 -25.7 133–197 +2.0
39 Jacory Croskey-Merritt RB WAS 157.8 -5.5 140–178 -9.0
40 J.K. Dobbins RB DEN 160.0 -3.4 146–185 -7.4
41 Rachaad White RB WAS 160.2 +2.2 136–190 -3.7
42 Jordan Mason RB MIN 163.6 +1.2 158–181 -12.9
43 Woody Marks RB HOU 164.4 +4.6 108–193 +7.8 CONTENTIOUS
44 Tyler Allgeier RB ARI 172.8 -1.7 144–197 -1.5
45 Tyrone Tracy Jr. RB NYG 177.4 -8.0 146–219 +1.2
46 Emmett Johnson RB KC 181.2 -8.0 153–200 -5.5
47 Mike Washington Jr. RB LV 181.8 +6.1 160–241 +10.9 CONTENTIOUS
48 Chris Rodriguez Jr. RB JAC 183.6 -2.7 164–219 -3.3
49 Dylan Sampson RB CLE 186.4 -3.0 164–216 -1.8
50 Aaron Jones Sr. RB MIN 186.6 +4.5 156–210 -1.4
51 Tyjae Spears RB TEN 192.6 +2.7 162–233 +2.9

Only one column here carries a tested signal. The rest is context. Everything below was measured over 296 position-weeks, 2021–2025.

Move — no predictive value
Change in consensus rank. Tested: correlation between movement and beating your own ranking is +0.02, surviving in one of five seasons and one of four positions. That is a null. The move is the consensus updating, so it is already priced. Shown because it is useful to know who is being talked about — not as a reason to draft anyone.
Excess — disagreement above normal for that slot
Analysts naturally disagree more about later picks (sd ≈ 6.46 + 0.0931 × ECR), so raw spread makes elite players look contentious when they are near-unanimous. This is the residual.
Contentious — the one tested edge, and it is small
Flagged only for QB and RB, where contentious players modestly beat their ranking (QB corr +0.088, t=3.08; RB +0.057, t=3.05). At WR and TE the same signal is exactly zero (+0.004 and +0.002), so they are never flagged — disagreement there is noise about a distribution everyone roughly agrees on.

Use it as a tiebreaker between players you already rate similarly, never as a reason to reach. The effect is worth a fraction of a round, per-season t-stats run 0.75–2.32, and the direction is consistent but the size is not well pinned down.