Game quality

What each result was worth beyond the score. Every play is graded by EPA (expected points added), then adjusted for who it came against: a defence's rating is what it allowed to everyone else that season, so a big day against a bad defence counts for less. Season views include playoff games.

Games

Adj margin = offence minus defence EPA per play after the opponent adjustment. Win exp = how often a team with that adjusted margin wins; a 55% win was a coin flip that landed. Win prob range = lowest and highest in-game chance, which is where blown leads and comebacks show.

TeamScorevs lineOff EPA/playraw → adj Def EPA/playraw → adjAdj marginWin exp Win prob rangeTurnoverslost / forced
DAL W 31–14 +14.5fav 2.5 +0.37 → +0.40 -0.05 → -0.06 +0.47 99%raw 100% 34% – 100% 0 / 1
@ TB L 14–31 -14.5dog 2.5 -0.05 → +0.02 +0.37 → +0.35 -0.33 2%raw 0% 0% – 66% 1 / 0
SEA L 23–41 -8.0dog 10.0 +0.08 → +0.15 +0.39 → +0.34 -0.19 11%raw 2% 0% – 52% 2 / 0
@ SF W 41–23 +8.0fav 10.0 +0.39 → +0.37 +0.08 → +0.07 +0.29 96%raw 98% 48% – 100% 0 / 2
NYG W 31–24 +9.5dog 2.5 +0.37 → +0.36 +0.17 → +0.17 +0.19 89%raw 94% 27% – 99% 0 / 0
@ MIN L 24–31 -9.5fav 2.5 +0.17 → +0.13 +0.37 → +0.40 -0.27 5%raw 6% 1% – 73% 0 / 0
BAL L 17–24 +0.5dog 7.5 -0.09 → -0.07 +0.04 → -0.02 -0.05 37%raw 15% 8% – 67% 2 / 1
@ CIN W 24–17 -0.5fav 7.5 +0.04 → +0.03 -0.09 → -0.10 +0.12 80%raw 85% 33% – 92% 1 / 2
MIA L 31–34 +11.0dog 14.0 -0.23 → -0.19 -0.15 → -0.25 +0.07 67%raw 26% 3% – 71% 2 / 3
@ BUF W 34–31 -11.0fav 14.0 -0.15 → -0.15 -0.23 → -0.24 +0.10 74%raw 74% 29% – 97% 3 / 2
LAC L 30–31 -3.0fav 2.0 +0.07 → +0.06 -0.03 → -0.03 +0.08 72%raw 80% 29% – 100% 0 / 4
@ JAX W 31–30 +3.0dog 2.0 -0.03 → -0.04 +0.07 → +0.05 -0.08 29%raw 20% 0% – 71% 4 / 0

Quarterbacks this week

Click a column to sort. Schedule = what the opponent adjustment added (+ = faced a tough pass defence). Turnover and sack EPA are what those plays cost; sacks are shared with the line.

QuarterbackTeam Opp DropbacksAdj EPA/dbRaw EPA/dbScheduleTotal adj EPA INT / FLTurnover EPASacksSack EPAWPACPOE
Dak Prescott DAL TB 34 +0.728 +0.702 +0.026 +24.8 0 / 0 +0.0 1 -2.2 +0.33 +13.4
Brock Purdy SF SEA 32 +0.681 +0.704 -0.022 +21.8 0 / 0 +0.0 1 -1.5 +0.39 +5.0
Daniel Jones NYG MIN 38 +0.359 +0.358 +0.001 +13.7 0 / 0 +0.0 3 -4.4 +0.49 -1.3
Kirk Cousins MIN NYG 39 +0.313 +0.314 -0.001 +12.2 0 / 0 +0.0 0 +0.0 +0.39 +13.7
Tyler Huntley BAL CIN 31 +0.129 +0.110 +0.019 +4.0 1 / 0 -4.7 2 -3.4 +0.09 -4.3
Joe Burrow CIN BAL 37 +0.122 +0.157 -0.035 +4.5 0 / 0 +0.0 4 -5.9 +0.05 +1.9
Geno Smith SEA SF 39 +0.113 +0.072 +0.040 +4.4 1 / 1 -9.3 3 -9.0 +0.20 +10.7
Justin Herbert LAC JAX 46 +0.110 +0.166 -0.056 +5.1 0 / 0 +0.0 3 -1.5 +0.08 -7.9
Tom Brady TB DAL 70 +0.037 -0.051 +0.088 +2.6 1 / 0 -5.7 2 -3.7 -0.19 -13.0
Trevor Lawrence JAX LAC 49 -0.107 -0.122 +0.015 -5.2 4 / 0 -16.5 2 -3.2 -0.20 -6.8
Skylar Thompson MIA BUF 50 -0.131 -0.193 +0.062 -6.5 2 / 0 -7.0 4 -6.1 -0.31 -17.0
Josh Allen BUF MIA 46 -0.253 -0.257 +0.004 -11.6 2 / 1 -18.6 7 -15.9 -0.24 +5.5
Opponent adjustment. A unit's rating for a game is its average over its other games that season, blended with 16 games' worth of prior (league average plus half of last season's gap from it; 24 games for pass defence, which is noisier). Early in a season that leans on last year; by midseason it is mostly this year. Chosen by how well it predicts a held-out game: it cut that error by about a quarter against no shrinkage, and adjusted numbers agree between odd and even weeks more than raw ones do (team EPA margin r 0.52 → 0.55, defence 0.32 → 0.36, QB EPA/dropback 0.47 → 0.49, 2016–2025).
Win expectancy is a logistic fit of wins on EPA margin over 6,036 completed games (it names the winner 86.5% of the time). These describe what happened; one game is not a forecast. Play-by-play credits the quarterback with every sack and dropback, so a bad line shows up in his numbers. Seasons 2016–2026, built 2026-09-14 01:25 UTC, from nflverse. Write-up: backtests/nfl_game_quality/FINDINGS.md.